Then the fire of the Lord fell and consumed the burnt sacrifice, and the wood and the stones and the dust, and it licked up the water that was in the trench. Now when all the people saw it, they fell on their faces; and they said, “The Lord, He is God! The Lord, He is God!”
Sign In Please
An elegant self check in app for small to mid-side clubs, classes, and meetings.
“BEST OF” - Links to MY most popular content
As we go into an election, it is important to identify that regardless of what the media says, regardless of the tactics that are used by campaigns to scare people into voting a certain way, our election process is not a fight against "the enemy." The belief in an enemy brings people to the polls, but I would encourage you to reject that way of thinking. The goal of our government, regardless of who is in power, is to abide by and protect our Constitution. Period. The idea that a political party is set on destroying the Constitution, through an amendment or a Supreme Court decision, is ludicrous. You might believe a particular law or policy has the potential to be especially damaging, but behind every one of those proposals are millions of thoughtful, dignified Americans who, whether directly or indirectly, voted that very law, proposition, candidate, or bill into being. When you echo derogatory terms to castigate ANY branch of our government, best case scenario, you may be 100% correct, but your language invites conflict with every voter who now feels a need to defend their vote against what they perceive as disrespectful or even treasonous opposition. Try on this phrase for size: “I think I understand what you are trying to accomplish via X, and I think your cause noble, but I disagree with your methods and I fear certain ramifications.” You’re not accomplishing something by simply calling the other side “evil”, but you’re doing a great job of building more barriers to prevent the conversation from moving forward.
Inspired by this post, I wanted to share a little bit about how I introduce circles. When I pose the questions that follow, I usually use PollEverywhere to survey the entire class at the same time. I find this encourages table discussion. Keep in mind, when I show the students these equations, students HAVE seen the Pythagorean theorem, but other than that, this is the first time they have seen anything resembling the equation for a circle. The answer is not at all immediately clear and many students take a "guess and check" approach to finding the solution
When I started my teaching career, I taught the constructions that were required on the state exams by providing my students with an overview of the conventional steps. I soon learned my approach was completely ineffective. No matter how I varied my instructions, many students perceived constructions as little more than "pictures" that needed to be memorized.
In my fourth year of teaching, I completely abandoned my traditional method. On the first day of the constructions unit, I have students take out their compasses and given them one goal and a few rules:
I would say my most developed unit in geometry was my logic unit. I took it as an opportunity to introduce geometry in a refreshing way for student who may have been turned off to math prior to taking my class. For the first several weeks, we focused on logic puzzles that we not "mathematical" in the traditional sense. This encouraged thinking and problem solving, but it also engaged all of my students, as all of the puzzles were approachable and had an accessible solution. The aim of the unit is to get students to write up the solutions to the puzzles in a two-column, "statement-justification" format.
For this activity, students must first be familiar with exam free response scoring rubrics. (I teach AP Computer Science A, which has plenty of resources available online for free response rubrics and scored samples.) When students have seen the rubrics enough to know how to earn partial credit on questions that would otherwise seem to difficult to approach, I turn it up the rigor: students work in groups to write their own rubrics and canonical solutions. The extra tasks turns familiarity into mastery.
I have a review activity that I love. I just started doing it a few weeks ago and I'm pretty sure I'll be doing it a lot more. Simple concept, great effect. After having students complete a multiple choice exam, (as a review, not for a grade) I put them in groups and have them take it again. When they are finished for the second time, I use answer sheets that I can scan with my phone (ZipGrade specifically) to give them instant feedback, telling them only the problems they got wrong but not the answers. They continue to work on the questions until a perfect score is achieved. Lastly, I return their original answer sheets (which I have already scanned) and they use their "answer key" to grade their own papers.
The decision to allow students to retake exams and every conversation surrounding it should be based on the best path for learning. Always remember that.
Lately, I was grappling with the question: "Is a full exam retake necessary and effective for each student whose score is almost perfect?" The question came up because, invariably, every class has those students who earn a 94% but still want to retake the exam and shoot for 100%. I will always allow this, but recently I was wondering if a retake is the best way to earn that extra 6%. I asked myself, "What would help this person increase his or her understanding from nearly perfect to perfect?" For such a student, I think retaking the exam is too mechanical, an trivial item on a checklist to achieve perfection. By contrast, I've heard it said you've never truly mastered something until you can teach it.
This game is astonishing. The base game (no cards) is already unlike anything I've ever played and deeply strategic. Furthermore, the components are gorgeous. If the entire game was just the base game, I would already highly recommend it, but the designer went a step further by adding the cards and including a three- and four-player mode. Some of the cards even allow alternate victory conditions. Though the game is designed for two players, four-player with cards is my favorite. As you can probably imagine, the cards provide too much information to keep track of and it can be a riot trying to plan moves with your partner while considering the abilities of your opponents. We've had some good laughs over the four player games. For people who like more strategy, removing the cards and playing the base game is a serious battle of cunning. I'm floored by all the game offers and its replayability.
If you are visiting this site for the first time, let me introduce myself. My name is Ben and I am a teacher. In 2014, I started advising an after school club. Because students who attended club regularly could earn a credit at the end of the year, I needed to take attendance. Unlike an official class, there was no official attendance sheet so, as was the custom at my school, students signed in by writing their name on a clipboard.
Whether you work in a classroom or an office, if you collect meeting attendance on paper, you understand how tedious paper attendance is. It's messy, difficult to read and especially difficult to enter into a computer. Like me, you may have already attempted to find an app or some sort of small-scale solution to your problem, only to find yourself sorely disappointed. I was disappointed but sometimes if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself..
When I was new to teaching, a mentor challenged me to consider an strategy about the career that lay before me. He said that once a year, I should select the most boring or challenging unit of my curriculum and carefully craft it into something more interesting and engaging. He said even if I had to spend all of my creative efforts on revitalizing that one unit, if I could manage to do that once a year, with some time I would have a some pretty exciting curricula!
Whether or not you teach computer science, you can take my word: teaching sorting algorithms is not very exciting.
As a Christian, it's weird hearing non-Christians describe Christianity. It's as if they've heard a single Bible verse, John 3:16, “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” Non-Christians know "Jesus died for our sins" but their understanding of his death is as a poorly planned symbol. Why does somebody have to die? Doesn't God make the rules? And if he does, can't God make the "wages of sin" whatever he wants? Furthermore, how is it that one person can take the punishment for someone else? How do we know salvation isn't an afterthought? Might it be the case that Jesus died and a group of diehard followers invented "salvation" as a means of keeping the up the momentum of the Jesus movement?
The Bible has some strange stories. Noah and the ark, Jonah and the whale only scratch the surface. Did you know Elisha summoned bears that mauled little boys who made fun of him? Did you know Balaam talks to a donkey just like Shrek?
From my own experience, it seems the most common, albeit disagreeable, answer has something to do with dismissing Levitical law as "cultural" and "not applicable in today's world." Even if that is true, there is a major flaw in that excuse: it isn't rooted in the Bible. No where in the Bible does it say Levitical law was cultural. If anything, it says the exact opposite. (Matthew 5:17-19) To be clear, the Bible says we are "dead to the law" (Romans 7) and in Acts 10, laws about food and who Jews may associate with are given a back seat in order to spread the gospel to Gentiles, but the Bible does not say the laws are flawed. They are and have always been good and deliberate commands from God. (Romans 7:12-13) When we dismiss parts of the law, we not only misrepresent the Bible, we appear to be cherry picking, waving our hands and manipulating the Bible to suit our purposes.
This question lies at the heart of so many questions. What happens to us after we die? Why did God put a forbidden tree in the garden of Eden? How can God send people to hell? They all boil down to, “Why did God make us?” Since "purpose" is such a broad topic, I am limiting my writing to the purpose of humanity at large and specifically how, in Christianity, our individual purpose is not something that is fulfilled after we die, but begins the moment we are saved.
God doesn’t create inquisitive minds just to disappoint them. Answers are in the Bible if you are willing to think. This series is about how, once I began to think about the Bible, logically and analytically, my faith was made stronger as I became convinced that the Bible is practical, coherent, consistent, and profound. I have ordered this series in such a way that the most common and fundamental questions are first. The focus becomes more and more narrow as you read through the series.
Some prophesies in the Bible are fulfilled twice. The first time is in an immediate but transient way and the second time is in an ultimate and eternal way. For instance, as Isaac follows Abraham up the mountain and asks about the lamb for the sacrifice, Abraham answers that God will provide a lamb. On that day, God does provide the sacrifice, but in Jesus Christ, God truly provides the sacrifice. When the Israelites cover their doors with blood at Passover, they are saved by the blood of the lamb, and in Jesus Christ, they are truly saved by the blood of the lamb. Throughout Kings, when God sheds mercy on Judah, he cites his promise to keep the line of David on the throne forever, but then we read about the travesty of the line of kings following David. In Jesus Christ, God truly keeps the line of David on the throne forever.
This pattern can also be observed in the case of a particularly striking prophesy made by Isaiah during the reign of Hezekiah's father, Ahaz. Recall when Judah was invaded by the kings of Israel and Aram. At that time, Ahaz was approached by Isaiah and told not to fear but to trust in God and ask for a sign. Ahaz turned from Isaiah and took matters into his own hands, but Isaiah would not be ignored. As Ahaz turned his back, Isaiah proclaimed that there would be a sign despite Ahaz' disobedience. The sign he gives him is one of the most famous prophesies in the entire Bible and is even quoted in the very first chapter of Matthew.
If I asked you to name a miracle in the Bible, you might say "the ten plagues" or "the parting of the Red Sea" or "the resurrection of Jesus". These miracles are more than just well known miracles, they are moments that shaped history. The ten plagues are remembered every time Passover is celebrated. The parting of the Red Sea was an event that liberated the Israelites and gave birth to a new nation. Easter is the grounds upon which all of Christianity is founded. Even for someone who doesn't believe in miracles, these mysterious and unexplainable events undeniably changed the world.
This story is about a miracle that is no less awesome or deserving, but no one ever thinks of it. Personally, I have never heard it taught in church. It won't be found in an illustrated children's Bible and, while it is printed in every edition of the Bible, most people who read it either skim over it or forget it entirely.
I saw Avengers: Infinity War last night and, because I was working on this study, it gave me pause as I thought about movie trailers. Why are they so enjoyable to watch? When I see a see trailers in the theatre, I often think, "Oh! I have to see that!" If or when I see the film, if it disappoints, I think, "The preview was better." Or, "All of the best parts were in the preview." If I wanted more enjoyment from the movies, I should honestly just stop watching trailers, but I won't. Why is that?
The interesting think about previews is, no matter how good they are or even how much content they contain, they can never stand in for the actual movie. Previews aren't stories, they are just teasers for a story. It's the story we crave. Never have I ever watched a preview and thought, "That was so wonderful, I won't even see the movie." While I know that is literally the job of the people making the preview, I also think the reason it is so effective is because we, the audience, want the details filled in. We want the context for the joke or the story behind the dramatic one-liner. I've seen previews that give away virtually the entire plot, but I still don't think it deters from the craving to see it filled out. Audiences love stories.
First, let me just say Part 2 is about my all time favorite Bible character, Elijah. I could write a series on just Elijah, but the purpose of this series is to focus on the overarching story. I omitted details from Part 1 to achieve this and I intend to treat Part 2 the same way, despite my utter fascination with 1 Kings 17 - 2 Kings 7. If you are interested in anything you read here, I would encourage you to do your own study of these chapters.
The books of Kings tell at least two stories. As the name implies, one of those stories is a chronicle of the kings of Israel and Judah. This story is corroborated by the books of 1 and 2 Chronicles. The second story is that of the prophets. If the first story is about what is happening on Earth, the second story is about what is happening in heaven. The first story describes the evil reigns of Jeroboam and Ahab, the second story describes God's response to them.
This is a story from the Tanakh, or what Christians call the "Old Testament". I'm actually growing rather fond of the former of these two names because 'Old' Testament seriously downplays its relevance. For reasons that will be made clear, I would frankly prefer to call it the "Awesome Testament" or maybe just the "Wow, That's Both Terrifying and Amazing" book. Anyway, I've chosen to call this story "An Epic Bible Story You've Never Heard" because it comes from two books of the Tenakh that get very little attention in church, but definitely deserves to be heard. This series is a condensed version of about 35 chapters. I've broken it into six parts: one part per week for six weeks.